Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. Lazard-Godchaux Co. of America, Inc.
199 A.D. 917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. Lazard-Godchaux Co. of America, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 207 A.D. 174 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1921·Published
Opinion
Order modified by providing that plaintiff have leave to renew the motion on proper papers, and as so modified affirmed, vdth ten dollars costs and [918]*918disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Page, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. Lazard-Godchaux Co. of America, Inc., 199 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
199 A.D. 917 (Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. Lazard-Godchaux Co. of America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.