Hong Mai v. Southeast Produce

855 N.E.2d 1168, 7 N.Y.3d 825, 822 N.Y.S.2d 754, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 2580
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 2006·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hong Mai v. Southeast Produce, 855 N.E.2d 1168, 7 N.Y.3d 825, 822 N.Y.S.2d 754, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 2580 (N.Y. 2006).

855 N.E.2d 1168 (Hong Mai v. Southeast Produce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.