Hong Mai v. Doe

Second Circuit

Hong Mai v. Doe

10 F. App'x 15

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 2001

DocketDocket No. 00-7266

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. App'x 15 (Hong Mai v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hong Mai v. Doe, 10 F. App'x 15 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff Hong Mai appeals from a judgment of the District Court, entered on February 14, 2000, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The District Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint because the complaint did not raise a federal question or allege diversity of citizenship. We agree and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff Hong Mai appeals from a judgment of the District Court, entered on February 14, 2000, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The District Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint because the complaint did not raise a federal question or allege diversity of citizenship. We agree and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. App'x 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hong-mai-v-doe-ca2-2001.