Honeywell International, Inc. v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________

2008-5181 __________________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 02-CV-1909, Judge Susan G. Braden.

__________________________

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING __________________________ HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL v. US 2

Before MAYER, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges. ORDER Combined petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc were filed by the appellees. A response was invited by the panel and filed by Honeywell International, Inc. That was followed by L-3 Communications Corpora- tion’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of its Petition for Rehearing. IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) L-3’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of its Petition for Rehearing is granted. (2) Appellees’ petitions for panel rehearing are granted for the limited purposes of revising por- tions of the discussion of the Invention Secrecy Act and to properly limit the scope of remand. (3) The previous opinion in this appeal issued Febru- ary 18, 2010 and reported at Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. U.S., 596 F.3d 800 (Fed. Cir. 2010) is withdrawn and replaced with the revised opinion accompany- ing this order. The petitions for rehearing en banc will be circulated to the full court along with a copy of this order.

FOR THE COURT

May 25, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Lawrence J. Gotts, Esq. John W. Harbin, Esq. Thomas J. Madden, Esq. Christopher L. Crumbley, Esq.