Honeywell International Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided January 27, 2022·No. 3:21-cv-00506·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:21CV506

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC., and ) METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER OPTO ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Consent Motion to File its Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under Seal. (Doc. No. 18). When a party makes a request to seal judicial records, the Court must: (1) give the public notice and a reasonable opportunity to challenge the request to seal; (2) “consider less drastic alternatives to sealing;” and (3) if it decides to seal, make specific findings and state the reasons for its decision to seal rather than choosing other alternatives. Virginia Dep’t of State Police v. Washington Post, 386 F.3d 567, 576 (4th Cir. 2004). In accordance with the law of this Circuit as well as the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public’s interest in access to such materials, and alternatives to sealing. The public has been provided with adequate notice and an opportunity to object to the Plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs filed their motion on January 26, 2022 and it has been accessible to the public through the Court’s electronic case filing system since that time. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient because a public filing of such materials would reveal confidential business information that would cause harm to the Parties should the information be disclosed. The Court concludes that the sealing of these documents is narrowly tailored to serve the interest of protecting the confidential information. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Seal is hereby GRANTED, and the following documents and materials shall be filed under seal until further Order of this Court: Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss.

Signed: January 27, 2022 Lbal Graham C. Mullen . United States District Judge “Se

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Honeywell International Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd., (W.D.N.C. 2022).

Honeywell International Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd. (Honeywell International Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.