Honeywell International Inc. v. Nokia Corp.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Honeywell International Inc. v. Nokia Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 400 F. App'x 557
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 1, 2010·No. 2010-1121·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., and HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC., Plaintiff-Appellants,

v.

NOKIA CORPORATION, NOKIA INC., FUJITSU LIMITED, FUJITSU AMERICA, INC., FUJITSU COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC., ALL AROUND CO. LTD., BOE-HYDIS TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD., PICVUE ELECTRONICS LIMITED, CURITEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KONINKLIJK PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V., HIGH TECH COMPUTER CORPORATION, WISTRON CORPORATION, MATSUSHITA ELETRICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., MATSUSHITA ELECTRONICAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, ARGUS (also known as Hartford Computer Group.), TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., and TOSHIBA CORPORATION, Defendants,

and

FUJIFILM CORPORATION and FUJIFILM U.S.A., Defendants-Appellees,

SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA INC. and SAMSUNG SDI CO. LTD., Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

2010-1121 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in consolidated Case Nos. 04-CV-1337, 04-CV-1338, 04-CV-1536, and 05-CV-0874, Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MARTIN R. LUECK, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiffs- appellants. With him on the brief were MATTHEW L. WOODS and STACIE E. OBERTS.

LAWRENCE ROSENTHAL, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants- appellees Fujifilm Corporation, et al. With him on the brief were IAN G. DIBERNARDO, ANGIE M. HANKINS, and MATTHEW W. SIEGAL.

STEPHEN S. KORNICZKY, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for defendants-appellees Samsung SDI America Inc., et al.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 1, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly _____________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Honeywell International Inc. v. Nokia Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Honeywell International Inc. v. Nokia Corp. (Honeywell International Inc. v. Nokia Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.