Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hunt Consolidated, Inc.
Opinion
VACATE and DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2015.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01605-CV
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant
V.
HUNT CONSOLIDATED, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-11695
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
The parties have filed an amended joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(2). In the motion, they state they have settled all matters in controversy between them
and ask the Court to vacate the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and dismiss
the case. We grant the motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and
dismiss the case. See id. 43.2(e).
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 141605F.P05 CHIEF JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-11695. No. 05-14-01605-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart HUNT CONSOLIDATED, INC., Appellee participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and DISMISS the case.
Based on the parties’ agreement, we ORDER each party bear its own costs of this appeal. The obligations of appellant Honeywell International, Inc., as principal, and Federal Insurance Company, as surety, on appellant’s supersedeas bond are RELEASED.
Judgment entered this 5th day of August, 2015.
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hunt Consolidated, Inc. (Honeywell International, Inc. v. Hunt Consolidated, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.