Honeycutt v. Thomason

130 S.E.2d 329, 259 N.C. 247, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 532
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 10, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E.2d 329 (Honeycutt v. Thomason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Honeycutt v. Thomason, 130 S.E.2d 329, 259 N.C. 247, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 532 (N.C. 1963).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

All of plaintiff’s assignments of error relate to the charge. They are without merit. The conflicts in the accounts of the accident made a case for the twelve. The court submitted the case to the jury on instructions free of prejudicial error.

No. error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E.2d 329, 259 N.C. 247, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honeycutt-v-thomason-nc-1963.