Honeycutt v. State

1928 OK CR 346, 273 P. 283, 41 Okla. Crim. 259, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 87
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 15, 1928
DocketNo. A-6128.
StatusPublished

This text of 1928 OK CR 346 (Honeycutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Honeycutt v. State, 1928 OK CR 346, 273 P. 283, 41 Okla. Crim. 259, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 87 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the district court of Sequoyah county on a charge of larceny of domestic live stock, and were each sentenced to serve a term of two years in the state penitentiary.

This is a companion case to the case of McClanahan v. State, 41 Okla. Cr. 15, 269 P. 782, and is based upon the larceny of one cow, the property of F. D. Cason, upon the same day that the larceny of the property described in the case just referred to was committed, but from a different owner. The evidence and the questions presented are substantially the same as in that case. There is sufficient evidence to amply sustain the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClanahan v. State
1928 OK CR 276 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1928 OK CR 346, 273 P. 283, 41 Okla. Crim. 259, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honeycutt-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.