Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Honeycutt v. State

Honeycutt v. State

768 So. 2d 1198, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11903, 2000 WL 1344683
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 2000
DocketNo. 4D00-1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 768 So. 2d 1198 (Honeycutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Honeycutt v. State, 768 So. 2d 1198, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11903, 2000 WL 1344683 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to Honey-cutt filing a facially sufficient claim pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000).

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nims v. Harrison
768 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 So. 2d 1198, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11903, 2000 WL 1344683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honeycutt-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.