Honeycutt v. State

768 So. 2d 1198, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11903, 2000 WL 1344683

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 20, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to Honey-cutt filing a facially sufficient claim pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000).

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Honeycutt v. State, 768 So. 2d 1198, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11903, 2000 WL 1344683 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

768 So. 2d 1198 (Honeycutt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.