Honeycutt v. Foster

Eighth Circuit

Honeycutt v. Foster

334 F. App'x 48

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedAugust 18, 2009

DocketNo. 08-1048

StatusPublished

This text of 334 F. App'x 48 (Honeycutt v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Honeycutt v. Foster, 334 F. App'x 48 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Honeycutt appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil action. After careful de novo review, see Redwood Vill. P’ship v. Graham, 26 F.3d 839, 840 (8th Cir.1994) (applying a de novo standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Honeycutt appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil action. After careful de novo review, see Redwood Vill. P’ship v. Graham, 26 F.3d 839, 840 (8th Cir.1994) (applying a de novo standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

334 F. App'x 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honeycutt-v-foster-ca8-2009.