Honey v. United States Marshals Service
This text of Honey v. United States Marshals Service (Honey v. United States Marshals Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
VICTOR CARL HONEY,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-1992 (JEB) UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Victor Honey filed a three-sentence pro se Complaint in D.C. Superior Court on
October 4, 2012. He alleged that the United States Marshals Service abused process in
connection with a landlord-tenant case in Superior Court. See ECF No. 1 (Notice of Removal),
Attach. 2 (Complaint). After USMS removed the case to this Court, it filed a Motion to Dismiss.
See ECF No. 4. On January 17, 2013, the Court issued a Minute Order directing Plaintiff to
respond to the Motion by February 8 or risk the Court’s deeming the matter conceded. When
Plaintiff failed to do so, the Court issued a longer Order citing Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507
(D.C. Cir. 1988), and instructing Plaintiff to file a response by March 6 or risk dismissal. See
ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has still not responded.
The Court will, therefore, treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the case without
prejudice. A contemporaneous Order will so state.
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: March 11, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Honey v. United States Marshals Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honey-v-united-states-marshals-service-dcd-2013.