Honesto v. California
135 S. Ct. 172, 190 L. Ed. 2d 12, 83 U.S.L.W. 3194, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6399
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Honesto v. California, 135 S. Ct. 172, 190 L. Ed. 2d 12, 83 U.S.L.W. 3194, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6399 (U.S. 2014).
135 S. Ct. 172 (Honesto v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)