Home/Supreme Court/Honesto v. California

Honesto v. California

135 S. Ct. 172, 190 L. Ed. 2d 12, 83 U.S.L.W. 3194, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6399
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 6, 2014
DocketNo. 13–10751.
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S. Ct. 172 (Honesto v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Honesto v. California, 135 S. Ct. 172, 190 L. Ed. 2d 12, 83 U.S.L.W. 3194, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6399 (U.S. 2014).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992)(per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 172, 190 L. Ed. 2d 12, 83 U.S.L.W. 3194, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honesto-v-california-scotus-2014.