Honegsberger v. Second Avenue R. R.

1 Daly 89
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedFebruary 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Daly 89 (Honegsberger v. Second Avenue R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Honegsberger v. Second Avenue R. R., 1 Daly 89 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1860).

Opinion

By The Court.

Hilton, J.

We think this case was properly left to the jury, and that the charge of the judge is not [91]*91open to any objection. When the law considers a child to be of sufficient maturity to go alone in the public streets (2 Rer. Stat. 5 th Ed. 165, § 266), it certainly cannot require any greater caution or prudence from it than its age will j ustify.

If, therefore, the child exercises the caution of one of it years, that is all that can be expected of it. To desire mr re would be to require it to have the judgment of a person m mature years : and as this would be impossible, the proposition is conclusively answered by saying that the law does 'not exact an impossibility. " ■

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Daly 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honegsberger-v-second-avenue-r-r-nyctcompl-1860.