Honea v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Honea v. Merit Systems Protection Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 524 F. App'x 623
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 8, 2012·No. 2012-3199·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 12-3199 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 11/08/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

muiteb ~tate~ ([ourt of §ppeaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ([irwit

MICHAELA. HONEA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent,

AND

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Intervenor.

2012-3199

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DE315H110178-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) moves without opposition to reform the caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) as respondent and DHS as intervenor.

Case: 12-3199 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 11/08/2012

MICHAEL HONEA V. MSPB 2

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The response briefs of the Board and DHS are due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s21

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Honea v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Honea v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Honea v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related