Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Honaker v. State

Honaker v. State

790 So. 2d 443, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3548, 2000 WL 305146
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 2000
DocketNo. 1D98-3370
StatusPublished

This text of 790 So. 2d 443 (Honaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Honaker v. State, 790 So. 2d 443, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3548, 2000 WL 305146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced as a prison re-leasee reoffender, and he has raised two arguments that the Prison Releasee Reof-fender Punishment Act, section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutional. We have previously addressed both of these challenges and found them each to [444]*444be without merit. See Chambers v. State, 752 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). However, we certify the same question previously certified in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999).

AFFIRMED.

MINER, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chambers v. State
752 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Woods v. State
740 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 So. 2d 443, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3548, 2000 WL 305146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honaker-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.