Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
HON. JOSHUA H. ROBERTS; HON. MARY : No. 136 MM 2023 C. MCGINLEY; HON. NICOLA HENRY- : TAYLOR; HON. SABRINA KORBEL; HON. : LISA G. MIDDLEMAN; HON. TIFFANY E. : SIZEMORE; HON. WRENNA L. WATSON; : AND HON. DAVID H. CONROY, :
:
Petitioners :
: :
v. :
: :
PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES' : RETIREMENT BOARD; DAVID R. : FILLMAN; GLENN E. BECKER; HON. JOHN : M. DISANTO; HON. DAN B. FRANKEL; : STACY GARRITY; HON. VINCENT J. : HUGHES; GREGORY K. JORDAN; HON. : PAUL SCHEMEL; MARY A. SODERBERG; : GREGORY C. THALL; AND RICHARD : VAGUE, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES : AS MEMBERS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA : STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT : BOARD, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Reply is
GRANTED, and the “Petition for Permission to Appeal Interlocutory Order under
Pa.R.A.P. 1311(b) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b)” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd (Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.