Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 9, 2024·No. 136 MM 2023·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

HON. JOSHUA H. ROBERTS; HON. MARY : No. 136 MM 2023 C. MCGINLEY; HON. NICOLA HENRY- : TAYLOR; HON. SABRINA KORBEL; HON. : LISA G. MIDDLEMAN; HON. TIFFANY E. : SIZEMORE; HON. WRENNA L. WATSON; : AND HON. DAVID H. CONROY, :

:

Petitioners :

: :

v. :

: :

PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES' : RETIREMENT BOARD; DAVID R. : FILLMAN; GLENN E. BECKER; HON. JOHN : M. DISANTO; HON. DAN B. FRANKEL; : STACY GARRITY; HON. VINCENT J. : HUGHES; GREGORY K. JORDAN; HON. : PAUL SCHEMEL; MARY A. SODERBERG; : GREGORY C. THALL; AND RICHARD : VAGUE, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES : AS MEMBERS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA : STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT : BOARD, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Reply is

GRANTED, and the “Petition for Permission to Appeal Interlocutory Order under

Pa.R.A.P. 1311(b) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b)” is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd, (Pa. 2024).

Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd (Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 702
Pennsylvania § 702(b)