Homuth v. Zapp

Texas Supreme Court

Homuth v. Zapp

33 Tex. 130

DecidedJuly 1, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Tex. 130 (Homuth v. Zapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Homuth v. Zapp, 33 Tex. 130 (Tex. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.

The appeal in this case is based upon frivolous ground. The object sought is, through this court, to revise a judgment for costs rendered in the District Court against defendant in error, as the administrator of Mary Craig’s estate, and tax them against him in his individual capacity; and we are asked to impeach the action of the County Court in granting letters of administration to Zapp. This is not a proceeding in which thé same can be done. The judgment of the Distrie: Court is afBrmed, with costs to defendant in error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.

The appeal in this case is based upon frivolous ground. The object sought is, through this court, to revise a judgment for costs rendered in the District Court against defendant in error, as the administrator of Mary Craig’s estate, and tax them against him in his individual capacity; and we are asked to impeach the action of the County Court in granting letters of administration to Zapp. This is not a proceeding in which thé same can be done. The judgment of the Distrie: Court is afBrmed, with costs to defendant in error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Tex. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homuth-v-zapp-tex-1870.