Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Homrighouse v. Wilson

Homrighouse v. Wilson

262 A.D. 796, 27 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5882
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 796 (Homrighouse v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Homrighouse v. Wilson, 262 A.D. 796, 27 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Special Term of Supreme Court, denying her motion to resettle a former order which denied her application for a new trial. The order is not appealable. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 609; Waltham, Manufacturing Company v. Brady, 67 App. Div. 102; West Side National Bank v. Warsaw Discount Bank, 204 id. 4; Bergin v. Anderson, 216 id. 844.) Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dutch-American Mercantile Corp. v. Safticraft Corp.
17 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 796, 27 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homrighouse-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1941.