Homrighouse v. Wilson
262 A.D. 796, 27 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5882
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Special Term of Supreme Court, denying her motion to resettle a former order which denied her application for a new trial. The order is not appealable. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 609; Waltham, Manufacturing Company v. Brady, 67 App. Div. 102; West Side National Bank v. Warsaw Discount Bank, 204 id. 4; Bergin v. Anderson, 216 id. 844.) Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Homrighouse v. Wilson, 262 A.D. 796, 27 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 796 (Homrighouse v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dutch-American Mercantile Corp. v. Safticraft Corp.
17 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)