Hommrich, D., Aplt. v. PUC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 23, 2026·No. 24 WAP 2025·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

DAVID N. HOMMRICH, : No. 24 WAP 2025 :

Appellant :

: :

v. :

: :

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY : COMMISSION, :

:

Appellee :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2026, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED.

See 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (limiting this Court’s jurisdiction to “appeals from final orders of

the Commonwealth Court entered in any matter which was originally commenced in the

Commonwealth Court”); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1) (defining a final order as one that “disposes

of all claims and of all parties”). Cf. Melvin v. Doe, 836 A.2d 42, 44 n.4 (Pa. 2003) (“[A]n

order denying a motion for summary judgment does not terminate the litigation, and thus

is not an appealable order.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hommrich, D., Aplt. v. PUC, (Pa. 2026).

Hommrich, D., Aplt. v. PUC (Hommrich, D., Aplt. v. PUC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melvin v. Doe
836 A.2d 42 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)