Hommrich, D., Aplt. v. PUC
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
DAVID N. HOMMRICH, : No. 24 WAP 2025 :
Appellant :
: :
v. :
: :
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY : COMMISSION, :
:
Appellee :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2026, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED.
See 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (limiting this Court’s jurisdiction to “appeals from final orders of
the Commonwealth Court entered in any matter which was originally commenced in the
Commonwealth Court”); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1) (defining a final order as one that “disposes
of all claims and of all parties”). Cf. Melvin v. Doe, 836 A.2d 42, 44 n.4 (Pa. 2003) (“[A]n
order denying a motion for summary judgment does not terminate the litigation, and thus
is not an appealable order.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hommrich, D., Aplt. v. PUC (Hommrich, D., Aplt. v. PUC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.