Homich v. Lake County School Board

779 So. 2d 567, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 2001 WL 85536
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2001
DocketNo. 5D99-2200
StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 567 (Homich v. Lake County School Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Homich v. Lake County School Board, 779 So. 2d 567, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 2001 WL 85536 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinions

COBB, J.

This is the administrative appeal of a decision by the Lake County School Board to demolish several historical buildings on the Roseborough Elementary School campus in Mount Dora, Florida. Appellants are residents of the City of Mount Dora who oppose the School Board’s decision to tear down the buildings.

The decision to tear down Roseborough Elementary has been the subject of long and apparently heated debate in the Mount Dora community. Since 1996, there have been three separate votes by the School Board to tear down the school. The first two votes were rescinded; the final vote was not. It is the latter vote which is the subject of this appeal. The five buildings that are the subject of this litigation were built by the City of Mount Dora between 1926 and 1934. The buildings are eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Sites. They are vacant, having been declared unsafe by the State Department of Education.

The appellants have failed to, show an abuse of discretion by the Lake County School Board, which apparently complied with the procedural steps required by the State Requirements for Educational Facilities and Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. Federal cases, federal statutes and federal administrative rules relied upon by the appellants are not applicable to this case. We affirm on the authority of Jones v. Braxton, 379 So.2d 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., concurs. GRIFFIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
401 U.S. 402 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Reiter v. City of Beloit
947 P.2d 425 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1997)
Hickory Neighborhood Defense League v. Burnley
703 F. Supp. 1208 (W.D. North Carolina, 1988)
Jones v. Braxton
379 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Galindo v. City of Coffeyville
885 P.2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 567, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 2001 WL 85536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homich-v-lake-county-school-board-fladistctapp-2001.