Homewood Peoples Bank v. McCutcheon

109 A. 873, 266 Pa. 116, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 515
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 5, 1920
DocketAppeal, No. 94
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 109 A. 873 (Homewood Peoples Bank v. McCutcheon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Homewood Peoples Bank v. McCutcheon, 109 A. 873, 266 Pa. 116, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 515 (Pa. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The note upon which this action was brought, dated June 12, 1903, was made by the appellee for the accommodation of Joseph R. Pauli, who at the time was president of the plaintiff bank. After the statute had run against the obligation, Pauli made payments on it, but not as agent of the appellee, and the latter did nothing acknowledging his continued liability. As to him the payments made by Pauli were insufficient to toll the statute: Coleman v. Fobes, 22 Pa. 156; Clark v. Burn et al., 86 Pa. 502; Wesner v. Stein and Greenawalt, 97 Pa. 322.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cumana Investments S.A. v. Fluor Corp.
593 F. Supp. 310 (D. Delaware, 1984)
Dick v. Daylight Garage, Inc.
6 A.2d 823 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Fowler v. Barlow Et Ux.
146 A. 77 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1929)
White v. Pittsburgh Vein Coal Co.
109 A. 873 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A. 873, 266 Pa. 116, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homewood-peoples-bank-v-mccutcheon-pa-1920.