Homesite Insurance v. Raley
This text of 608 F. App'x 162 (Homesite Insurance v. Raley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kyle Raley seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting default judgment against his co-defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Raley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. The case is still ongoing against Raley, as there has been .no order entered dismissing him from the suit or entering judgment for or against him. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 F. App'x 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homesite-insurance-v-raley-ca4-2015.