Homes for the Homeless, Inc. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

855 N.E.2d 1166, 7 N.Y.3d 822
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 2006·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, the petition dismissed and the certified question answered in the negative. The determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals denying the expansion component of petitioner’s variance application was rational and supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of SoHo Alliance v New York City Bd. of Stds. & Appeals, 95 NY2d 437, 440 [2000]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Homes for the Homeless, Inc. v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 855 N.E.2d 1166, 7 N.Y.3d 822 (N.Y. 2006).

855 N.E.2d 1166 (Homes for the Homeless, Inc. v. Board of Standards & Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SoHo Alliance v. New York City Board of Standards & Appeals
741 N.E.2d 106 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)