Homero Sanchez Pineda v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Homero Sanchez Pineda v. United States

393 F.2d 139

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 17, 1968

Docket25031_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 393 F.2d 139 (Homero Sanchez Pineda v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Homero Sanchez Pineda v. United States, 393 F.2d 139 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal from a conviction for narcotic violations under Title 21, United States Code, Sections 173 and 174, raises the sole question whether the appellant was within the territorial limits of the United States when he had not left the custody of the customs officials. The contention is novel, but we conclude without merit. See United States v. Morello, 2 Cir., 250 F.2d 631 and Palmero v. United States, 1 Cir., 112 F.2d 922.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal from a conviction for narcotic violations under Title 21, United States Code, Sections 173 and 174, raises the sole question whether the appellant was within the territorial limits of the United States when he had not left the custody of the customs officials. The contention is novel, but we conclude without merit. See United States v. Morello, 2 Cir., 250 F.2d 631 and Palmero v. United States, 1 Cir., 112 F.2d 922.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 F.2d 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homero-sanchez-pineda-v-united-states-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack