Homero Roman v. Marta Romero
This text of Homero Roman v. Marta Romero (Homero Roman v. Marta Romero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00578-CV
Homero Roman, Appellant
v.
Marta Romero, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 428TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 10-0002, HONORABLE RONALD G. CARR, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O NHomero Roman filed a notice of appeal on August 16, 2011. Counsel for Mr. Roman forthrightly acknowledges that this was after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, July 5, 2011. Moreover, because the notice of appeal was filed more than fifteen days after the deadline, we have no discretion to grant an extension pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 26.3. Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Under the circumstances, we have no discretion but to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: December 14, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Homero Roman v. Marta Romero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homero-roman-v-marta-romero-texapp-2011.