Homero Cervantes v. Arthur G. Spickerman
This text of 448 F.2d 653 (Homero Cervantes v. Arthur G. Spickerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
448 F.2d 653
Homero CERVANTES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arthur G. SPICKERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-1106. Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 28, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Ernest Gewin, Judge.
William Duncan, Kemp, Smith, White, Duncan & Hammond, El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Ramon Ramos, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG, and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F.2d 653, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homero-cervantes-v-arthur-g-spickerman-ca5-1971.