Homer v. State Board of Education

89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 726, 56 Vroom 726, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 207
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 29, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch, in Gowdy v. State Board of Education, in the Supreme Court. 55 Vroom 231.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yrbdbnburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Homer v. State Board of Education, 89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 726, 56 Vroom 726, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1914).

89 A. 1135 (Homer v. State Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pros., Det., Essex Cty. v. Hudson Bd. Freeholders
324 A.2d 897 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)