Homer v. State Board of Education

89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 726, 56 Vroom 726, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 207
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 A. 1135 (Homer v. State Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Homer v. State Board of Education, 89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 726, 56 Vroom 726, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch, in Gowdy v. State Board of Education, in the Supreme Court. 55 Vroom 231.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yrbdbnburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pros., Det., Essex Cty. v. Hudson Bd. Freeholders
324 A.2d 897 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 726, 56 Vroom 726, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homer-v-state-board-of-education-nj-1914.