Homer v. Palm Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Homer v. Palm Corp.

264 So. 2d 120, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6528

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1972

DocketNo. 70-469

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 So. 2d 120 (Homer v. Palm Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Homer v. Palm Corp., 264 So. 2d 120, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was issued on February 9, 1971 (243 So.2d 641) reversing the final judgment of the circuit court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed April 26, 1972 (261 So.2d 822) and mandate now lodged in this court quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the final judgment of the trial court;

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on February 25, 1971 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed February 9, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the final judgment of the circuit court ap[121]*121pealed from herein is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A. R., 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was issued on February 9, 1971 (243 So.2d 641) reversing the final judgment of the circuit court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed April 26, 1972 (261 So.2d 822) and mandate now lodged in this court quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the final judgment of the trial court;

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on February 25, 1971 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed February 9, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the final judgment of the circuit court ap[121]*121pealed from herein is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A. R., 32 F.S.A.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 So. 2d 120, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homer-v-palm-corp-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack