Homer v. Palm Corp.

264 So. 2d 120, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6528
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1972·No. No. 70-469·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was issued on February 9, 1971 (243 So.2d 641) reversing the final judgment of the circuit court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed April 26, 1972 (261 So.2d 822) and mandate now lodged in this court quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the final judgment of the trial court;

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on February 25, 1971 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed February 9, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the final judgment of the circuit court ap[121]*121pealed from herein is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A. R., 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Homer v. Palm Corp., 264 So. 2d 120, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

264 So. 2d 120 (Homer v. Palm Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mallard v. Tele-Trip Co.
398 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)