Homer v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

220 So. 2d 361, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2421
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 12, 1969·No. No. 37747·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the petition, briefs and oral argument in this cause we conclude that the writ of certiorari should be discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., dissents with opinion. ADKINS, J., dissents and concurs with ERVIN, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Homer v. Connecticut General Life Insurance, 220 So. 2d 361, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2421 (Fla. 1969).

220 So. 2d 361 (Homer v. Connecticut General Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yunkers v. Yunkers
515 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Markham v. Friedland
245 So. 2d 645 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Allen v. Dickinson
223 So. 2d 310 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)