Homer Mathis Hodges v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Homer Mathis Hodges v. United States

230 F.2d 951

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 18, 1956·No. 12668·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, having been heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel for the parties;

And it appearing that appellant, an employee of the Railway Express Agency, was found guilty by a jury of the theft of two guns moving in interstate ■commerce in violation of Title 18 U.S. C.A. § 659;

And the court being of the opinion that there was substantial credible evidence to support the verdict, and that therefore the trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal; and the court also being of the opinion that in the exclusion and admission of evidence the district ■court committed no error prejudicial to the appellant;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, having been heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel for the parties;

And it appearing that appellant, an employee of the Railway Express Agency, was found guilty by a jury of the theft of two guns moving in interstate ■commerce in violation of Title 18 U.S. C.A. § 659;

And the court being of the opinion that there was substantial credible evidence to support the verdict, and that therefore the trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal; and the court also being of the opinion that in the exclusion and admission of evidence the district ■court committed no error prejudicial to the appellant;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Homer Mathis Hodges v. United States, 230 F.2d 951 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

230 F.2d 951 (Homer Mathis Hodges v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related