Homer Anderson v. Clinchfield Coal Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

929 F.2d 691, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902, 1991 WL 38681
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 1991
Docket91-1405
StatusUnpublished

This text of 929 F.2d 691 (Homer Anderson v. Clinchfield Coal Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Homer Anderson v. Clinchfield Coal Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 929 F.2d 691, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902, 1991 WL 38681 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

929 F.2d 691
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Homer ANDERSON, Petitioner,
v.
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 91-1405.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 25, 1991.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

Homer Anderson, petitioner pro se.

Michael Francis Blair, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Va., Dorothy L. Page, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Homer Anderson seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Anderson v. Clinchfield Coal Co., 88-3134-BLA (Ben.Rev.Bd. Dec. 21, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 F.2d 691, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902, 1991 WL 38681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homer-anderson-v-clinchfield-coal-company-director-office-of-workers-ca4-1991.