Homeowners v. Bush
This text of Homeowners v. Bush (Homeowners v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY, ETC.,
Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v. Case No. 5D15-2600
ANTHONY BUSH AND OLGA BEDOYA,
Appellees/Cross-Appellants. ___________________________________/
Opinion filed March 3, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Lawrence R. Kirkwood, Senior Judge.
Scott A. Cole, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami and David C. Borucke, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Mark A. Nation and Paul W. Pritchard, of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court without prejudice to Cross-Appellants to
file a supplemental claim on the actual replacement cost of the pool screen enclosure.
AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Homeowners v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homeowners-v-bush-fladistctapp-2017.