Home Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Commissioner

3 B.T.A. 548, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2623
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 1926
DocketDocket No. 3323.
StatusPublished

This text of 3 B.T.A. 548 (Home Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Home Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Commissioner, 3 B.T.A. 548, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2623 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[549]*549OPINION.

Steenhagen

: From the foregoing facts, which are all those in the record in respect of the factors of taxable income, it is utterly impossible to determine the taxpayer’s liability. Briefs have been filed upon the question whether the reimbursement by the Postmaster General of the company’s income tax under section 5 of the contract was taxable income of the company, and whether that issue is controlled by the decision in Appeal of New York, Ontario & Western Ry. Co., 1 B. T. A. 1172. But the facts are inadequate for the consideration of such questions. Did the company pay any taxes, and, if so, what were they, how were they computed, and how were they assessed ? Did the Postmaster General pay the company, and, if so, when and in what amount? The equivocal fact that the taxpayer allocated certain amounts is too uncertain, and we dare not assume its significance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Home Telephone & Telegraph Co.
3 B.T.A. 548 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 548, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-tel-tel-co-v-commissioner-bta-1926.