Home Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. George
This text of 57 Cal. 363 (Home Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no error in the case as presented in the transcript. Conceding that any one of the sureties might have had the benefit of the set-off pleaded by their principal, if they had united with him in pleading it, neither of them did so unite. The principal did not appeal. Only one of the sureties appealed, and as he did not unite in making the defense in the Court below, he cannot be heard in relation to it here.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 Cal. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-security-building-loan-assn-v-george-cal-1881.