Home Savings of America, FSB v. Favata

244 A.D.2d 155, 663 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11102
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 155 (Home Savings of America, FSB v. Favata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Home Savings of America, FSB v. Favata, 244 A.D.2d 155, 663 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Amended order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen J.), entered March 28, 1997, which, in an action alleging misappropriation of trust funds by defendant Amoros and seeking to hold defendants-appellants law partnership and its individual partners liable therefor, inter alia, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Appellants’ contention that summary judgment was improperly based on inadmissible evidence is improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see, Reynolds v City of New York, 221 AD2d 185), and, in any event, without merit. Even if Amoros’ plea allocution were disregarded, appellants’ own submissions, which establish that defendant firm, in the ordinary course of its business, received trust funds from plaintiff that were held in its mortgage trust account, that Amoros was an authorized signatory on the mortgage trust account and the head of the firm’s mortgage and real estate closing departments, and that Amoros misappropriated the funds, warrant application of traditional principles of partnership law dictating appellants’ liability for Amoros’ breach of trust (Partnership Law § 25 [2]; § 26 [1]; Client’s Sec. Fund v Grandeau, 72 NY2d 62, 67). We have considered appellants’ other arguments and find that they are unpreserved or without merit. Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murray v. Farrell
97 A.D.3d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D.2d 155, 663 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-savings-of-america-fsb-v-favata-nyappdiv-1997.