Home Savings Ass'n of Florida v. Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund

479 So. 2d 191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2596, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1985·No. No. 85-406·Published

Opinions

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly considered the provisions of a contract, which was attached to and incorporated into the complaint by reference, in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss. Len Hazen Painters, Inc. v. Wood-Hopkins Construction Co., 396 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

BARKDULL and FERGUSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Home Savings Ass'n of Florida v. Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund, 479 So. 2d 191, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2596, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

479 So. 2d 191 (Home Savings Ass'n of Florida v. Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Helms v. General Film Development Corp.
346 So. 2d 1064 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Len Hazen Painters, Inc. v. Wood-Hopkins Construction Co.
396 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)