Home Realty Corp. v. Morrow

108 S.E. 481, 27 Ga. App. 385, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 918
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 27, 1921
Docket12054
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 481 (Home Realty Corp. v. Morrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Home Realty Corp. v. Morrow, 108 S.E. 481, 27 Ga. App. 385, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 918 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where money is paid to the agent of another, the payer can not, in a suit against the agent, recover the sum thus paid, where the agent had, before the suit, paid the money over to his principal.

2. When a principal authorizes his agent, who has in his hands money collected for the principal, to appropriate the money to the cancellation of an indebtedness due by the principal to the agent, this is equivalent to the agents’s paying the money to his principal.

3. This being a suit in the municipal court of Atlanta by the payer against the agent, and a verdict for the defendant being demanded as a matter of law, the judge of the superior court erred in not sustaining the defendant’s certiorari complaining of a judgment rendered for the plaintiff. Judgment reversed.

Jenhins, P. J., and Hill, J., conewr. Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw, for plaintiff in error. J. Caleb Clarke, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John L. Burns, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
268 F. Supp. 222 (N.D. Georgia, 1967)
Rhodes v. Tomlin
102 So. 2d 904 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Rush v. Autry
82 S.E.2d 866 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 481, 27 Ga. App. 385, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-realty-corp-v-morrow-gactapp-1921.