Home Pattern Co. v. Greenfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Home Pattern Co. v. Greenfield

193 A.D. 886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D. 886 (Home Pattern Co. v. Greenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Home Pattern Co. v. Greenfield, 193 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

The letter dated August 15, 1918, amounted to a refusal to take any more merchandise from plaintiff. Being sent before the end of the term of the contract, it left defendant liable for any damages that it might suffer from the breach, but did not enable plaintiff to force defendant to go on taking shipments. As no such damages were established, the court rightly limited the vendor’s recovery to the prior shipments. (Nichols v. Scranton Steel Co., 137 N. Y. 471; Pers. Prop, Law, § 145.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The letter dated August 15, 1918, amounted to a refusal to take any more merchandise from plaintiff. Being sent before the end of the term of the contract, it left defendant liable for any damages that it might suffer from the breach, but did not enable plaintiff to force defendant to go on taking shipments. As no such damages were established, the court rightly limited the vendor’s recovery to the prior shipments. (Nichols v. Scranton Steel Co., 137 N. Y. 471; Pers. Prop, Law, § 145.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-pattern-co-v-greenfield-nyappdiv-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack