Home Mutual Insurance v. Callaway
This text of 151 S.E.2d 182 (Home Mutual Insurance v. Callaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The error enumerated in this appeal is the overruling of the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto as to the award of penalties and attorney’s fees. The insured’s proof of loss under the homeowner’s insurance policy claimed a loss of $3,214.47, and suit was brought to recover that amount. The verdict returned for the insured’s loss was for $2,300. “Where the verdict in a suit on an insurance policy is for substantially less than the amount claimed in the proof of loss and less than the amount demanded in the petition, no recovery for damages and attorney’s fees is authorized.” Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Boney, 113 Ga. App. 459 (148 SE2d 457).
The trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto as to the award of penalties and attorney’s fees.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 S.E.2d 182, 114 Ga. App. 316, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-mutual-insurance-v-callaway-gactapp-1966.