Home Life Insurance v. Breslerman

168 Misc. 117, 5 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1686
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 20, 1938·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The uncontradicted evidence showed that the conduct of the family of the overhead tenant resulting in continual noises and disturbances deprived the appellant of the beneficial enjoyment of the demised apartment and that the respondent landlord with ample notice of the existent conditions took no effective steps as he was authorized to do under his lease with the overhead tenant to abate the nuisance. Appellant, therefore, has sustained his defense of constructive eviction.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Home Life Insurance v. Breslerman, 168 Misc. 117, 5 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

168 Misc. 117 (Home Life Insurance v. Breslerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bocchini v. Gorn Management Co.
515 A.2d 1179 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1986)
Department of Civil Rights v. Beznos Corp.
365 N.W.2d 82 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1985)
Blackett v. Olanoff
358 N.E.2d 817 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1977)
Cohen v. Werner
85 Misc. 2d 341 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Cohen v. Werner
82 Misc. 2d 295 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Trustees of the Sailors' Snug Harbor v. Sugarman
264 A.D. 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)