Home & Land Co. v. Mietlicki

New York County Courts

Home & Land Co. v. Mietlicki

10 Misc. 2d 307, 174 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3563

DecidedApril 3, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 2d 307 (Home & Land Co. v. Mietlicki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Home & Land Co. v. Mietlicki, 10 Misc. 2d 307, 174 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3563 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Frank J. Kronenberg, J.

This Beal Property Law article 15 action involves the validity of a county tax sale certificate and the subsequent tax deed given by the County Treasurer to defendant some 15 years after the tax sale. The deed stated that it was given without recourse against the ' treasurer of the county.

Defendant moves to join as parties defendant the county and the County Treasurer.

Obviously the County Treasurer and the county have more than an academic interest in this lawsuit since its result may affect the validity of other similar tax deeds. However, neither party may assert any claim for relief against the County Treasurer or the county and therefore they are not necessary or proper parties.

The motion is denied, without prejudice to any application by the treasurer or county to appear as amicus curias.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank J. Kronenberg, J.

This Beal Property Law article 15 action involves the validity of a county tax sale certificate and the subsequent tax deed given by the County Treasurer to defendant some 15 years after the tax sale. The deed stated that it was given without recourse against the ' treasurer of the county.

Defendant moves to join as parties defendant the county and the County Treasurer.

Obviously the County Treasurer and the county have more than an academic interest in this lawsuit since its result may affect the validity of other similar tax deeds. However, neither party may assert any claim for relief against the County Treasurer or the county and therefore they are not necessary or proper parties.

The motion is denied, without prejudice to any application by the treasurer or county to appear as amicus curias.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Misc. 2d 307, 174 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-land-co-v-mietlicki-nycountyct-1958.