Home Indemnity Co. v. City of Long Beach

57 A.D.2d 832, 393 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12034
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action inter alia, on a contract, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 22, 1976, as, upon granting its motion for reargument, adhered to that portion of a prior order of the same court which granted defendant-respondent’s motion for leave to amend its answer. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Leave to amend pleadings shall be freely given, unless substantial prejudice can be demonstrated (CPLR 3025). Plaintiff-appellant’s claim of prejudice is too speculative to justify denying defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Home Indemnity Co. v. City of Long Beach, 57 A.D.2d 832, 393 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

57 A.D.2d 832 (Home Indemnity Co. v. City of Long Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flowers v. Mombrun
181 N.Y.S.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)