Home Indem. Company v. Hoechst-Celanese Corporation

396 S.E.2d 611, 327 N.C. 428
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 29, 1990
Docket380P90
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 396 S.E.2d 611 (Home Indem. Company v. Hoechst-Celanese Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Home Indem. Company v. Hoechst-Celanese Corporation, 396 S.E.2d 611, 327 N.C. 428 (N.C. 1990).

Opinion

396 S.E.2d 611 (1990)
327 N.C. 428

The HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, The Home Insurance Company and City Insurance Company
v.
HOECHST-CELANESE CORPORATION, Ace Insurance Company, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Aiu Insurance Company, et al.

No. 380P90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 1990.

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, Charlotte, for Hoechst-Celanese Corp.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Charlotte, for several appellants.

Bell, Davis & Pitt, Winston-Salem, and Rivkin, Radler, Bayh, Hart & Kremer, Uniondale, N.Y., for Commercial Union Ins. Co.

Sheft and Sheft, New York City, and Petree, Stockton & Robinson, Charlotte, for several defendants.

Underwood, Kinsey & Warren, Charlotte, for Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Several Appellants in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant (Hoechst-Celanese); and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Several Appellants pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

*612 "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of August 1990."

The Petition for Discretionary Review is:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of August 1990."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants (AIU Group) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of August 1990."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cinoman v. University of North Carolina
764 S.E.2d 619 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Cinoman v. Univ. of N.C.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Muter v. Muter
689 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Wachovia Bank v. Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, LTD.
687 S.E.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Park East Sales v. Clark-Langley, Inc.
651 S.E.2d 235 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Green v. Wilson
592 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Home Indemnity Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
493 S.E.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
Home Indem. Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
493 S.E.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
Lawyers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Pollard
435 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 S.E.2d 611, 327 N.C. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-indem-company-v-hoechst-celanese-corporation-nc-1990.