Home Diathermy Co. v. White

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Home Diathermy Co. v. White

35 Misc. 2d 181, 232 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3836

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 2d 181 (Home Diathermy Co. v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Home Diathermy Co. v. White, 35 Misc. 2d 181, 232 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the record shows that the default was not willful, it was improper to require that the defendant post a bond or cash as a condition for opening default. The condition that the judgment stand as security is sufficient (Schlein v. Schlein, 276 App. Div. 951; Ettlinger v. Lepow Securities Corp., 21 Misc 2d 262).

The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the requirement of posting cash or good security, and allowing the judgment to stand as security, and as so modified should be affirmed, with $10 costs to defendant.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI