Home Design Services, Inc. v. Schwab Development Corp.

Eleventh Circuit

Home Design Services, Inc. v. Schwab Development Corp.

215 F. App'x 822

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 24, 2007·No. No. 06-10003·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, and for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that there were no satisfactory lesser sanctions. We conclude that there has been no abuse of discretion, and that the judgment of the district court dismissing this case with prejudice is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, and for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that there were no satisfactory lesser sanctions. We conclude that there has been no abuse of discretion, and that the judgment of the district court dismissing this case with prejudice is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Home Design Services, Inc. v. Schwab Development Corp., 215 F. App'x 822 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

215 F. App'x 822 (Home Design Services, Inc. v. Schwab Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related