Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co.
This text of Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co. (Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 1, 2010 No. 09-10254 JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 07-01372-CV-T-26-EAJ
HOME DEPOT USA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff-Counter- Defendant-Appellee,
versus
AMORE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida corporation,
Defendant-Cross- Defendant-Counter- Claimant-Appellant,
DAVID BARRON LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation,
Defendant-Cross- Claimant-Counter- Claimant-Appellant. ________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (March 1, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this case, the district court, following a bench trial, found for plaintiff
Home Depot on its claim for declaratory relief and against defendants Amore
Construction and David Barron Land Development on their counterclaims for
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and negligent
misrepresentation. After hearing oral argument of counsel in defendants' appeal,
we agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of
December 15, 2008, that the defendants' counterclaims lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-depot-usa-inc-v-amore-construction-co-ca11-2010.