Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co.

Eleventh Circuit

Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co.

368 F. App'x 60

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 1, 2010·No. No. 09-10254·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the district court, following a bench trial, found for plaintiff Home Depot on its claim for declaratory relief and against defendants Amore Construction and David Barron Land Development on their counterclaims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and negligent misrepresentation. After hearing oral argument of counsel in defendants’ appeal, we agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in its disposi-[61] tive order of December 15, 2008, that the defendants’ counterclaims lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the district court, following a bench trial, found for plaintiff Home Depot on its claim for declaratory relief and against defendants Amore Construction and David Barron Land Development on their counterclaims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and negligent misrepresentation. After hearing oral argument of counsel in defendants’ appeal, we agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in its disposi-[61] tive order of December 15, 2008, that the defendants’ counterclaims lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co., 368 F. App'x 60 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

368 F. App'x 60 (Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.