Home Cab Co. v. Wichita

295 U.S. 716, 55 S. Ct. 658
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 29, 1935·No. No. 857·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the [717] want of a properly presented federal question, Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-198; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633-635; New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 650; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 362-363; and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, 247 U. S. 350, 353; Chicago Great Western Ry. v. Kendall, 266 U. S. 94, 99; Southern Ry. Co. v. Watts, 260 U. S. 519, 526-527.

Mr. James G. Martin for appellant. Mr. Harry W. Hart for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Home Cab Co. v. Wichita, 295 U.S. 716, 55 S. Ct. 658 (1935).

295 U.S. 716 (Home Cab Co. v. Wichita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Wichita v. Home Cab Co.
101 P.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)
Montjoy v. Kentucky
298 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1936)