Home Cab Co. v. Wichita
295 U.S. 716, 55 S. Ct. 658
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the [717] want of a properly presented federal question, Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-198; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633-635; New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 650; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 362-363; and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, 247 U. S. 350, 353; Chicago Great Western Ry. v. Kendall, 266 U. S. 94, 99; Southern Ry. Co. v. Watts, 260 U. S. 519, 526-527.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Home Cab Co. v. Wichita, 295 U.S. 716, 55 S. Ct. 658 (1935).
295 U.S. 716 (Home Cab Co. v. Wichita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Wichita v. Home Cab Co.
101 P.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)
Montjoy v. Kentucky
298 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1936)