Home Builders Ass'n of Central New York, Inc. v. Town of Onondaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Home Builders Ass'n of Central New York, Inc. v. Town of Onondaga

35 A.D.3d 1204, 825 N.Y.S.2d 406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.D.3d 1204 (Home Builders Ass'n of Central New York, Inc. v. Town of Onondaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Home Builders Ass'n of Central New York, Inc. v. Town of Onondaga, 35 A.D.3d 1204, 825 N.Y.S.2d 406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered October 20, 2005 in a declaratory judgment action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the cross motion of plaintiffs to compel responses to their first request for production of documents.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[1205]*1205Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We add only that, given the court’s express denial of any discovery related to legal fees and services, defendants’ compliance with plaintiffs’ first request for production of documents is limited to engineering fees and services. Present—Scudder, PJ., Martoche, Centra and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered October 20, 2005 in a declaratory judgment action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the cross motion of plaintiffs to compel responses to their first request for production of documents.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[1205]*1205Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We add only that, given the court’s express denial of any discovery related to legal fees and services, defendants’ compliance with plaintiffs’ first request for production of documents is limited to engineering fees and services. Present—Scudder, PJ., Martoche, Centra and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A.D.3d 1204, 825 N.Y.S.2d 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-builders-assn-of-central-new-york-inc-v-town-of-onondaga-nyappdiv-2006.