Hom v. Hom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hom v. Hom

2 A.D.3d 493, 767 N.Y.S.2d 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 493 (Hom v. Hom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hom v. Hom, 2 A.D.3d 493, 767 N.Y.S.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered April 10, 1992, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Maraño, J.), entered December 17, 2001, which, inter alia, denied his motion to vacate the divorce judgment, and (2) an order of the same court entered December 24, 2001, which denied his motion, among other things, to compel certain discovery.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of divorce (see Culp v Culp, 117 AD2d 700 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered April 10, 1992, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Maraño, J.), entered December 17, 2001, which, inter alia, denied his motion to vacate the divorce judgment, and (2) an order of the same court entered December 24, 2001, which denied his motion, among other things, to compel certain discovery.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of divorce (see Culp v Culp, 117 AD2d 700 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 493, 767 N.Y.S.2d 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hom-v-hom-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack